Did you give Google permission to -

Oh, that's a silly question. Of course you did. Somewhere along the line you clicked "Accept," and voila. This happened.

Like this.

And it works on an individual level, too. Venturebeat:

I guess that's cool. I'd prefer to do it myself, though. Teach a man to created an animated gif, and you've freed him from the robots.

Oh, speaking of which:

Depends. Some starve, because they can't be bothered to go to the Fish Depot and get their fish, so they rob someone else on the way back. Or they can't afford the monthly premium for access to the robot-harvested fish, which is required because it costs a lot to keep the robot fishers going. Or they live with someone who fishes, unless that's been banned by the big, influential Robot lobby.

I was thinking about that aphorism the other day, and wondered: maybe the person to whom you give a fish and feed for a day doesn't live anywhere near water. The fish could be in the form of a McDonald's sandwich, in which case teaching him how to fish isn't very helpful. See, you put the bait on the hook, like this, then dangle the pole -

I know that. I'm not stupid. If I lived anywhere that had fish I'd do it, because I'm hungry. What I need is access to fresh water, a pole, bait, and transportation to and from the fishing area.

Sorry, I just thought that teaching you how to fish would help.

Doesn't, really, but thanks for the thought.

Back to the original idea: how could robot fishers lead to universal starvation? That's idiocy. It's not the means by which fish are caught, it's the amount and the distribution. But we're talking about something else here.

The number of Reddit members who advocate for something is as compelling as the number of comments on a YouTube video about a monkey trying to peel a greased banana, but nevermind. Here's the amusing part:

So: "Area Man Asks For Money Online, Gets $500."